MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Emilio Nava [140th] vs Alibek Kachmazov [183rd] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Nava 1 - 0 Kachmazov

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Kachmazov winning 0. The last match between Nava and Kachmazov was at the Helsinki Challenger, 04-11-2024, First, I.hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Emilio Nava 1
Alibek Kachmazov 0
Nava vs Kachmazov H2H Profile
Nava Stats Kachmazov
78% (31-9) YTD Win/Loss 41% (7-10)
1 Head-to-Head 0
140 Ranking 183
124 Highest Rank 172
23 Age 22
R Plays R
6 Titles 8
60% (219-146) Career Total W/L 60% (197-133)
$442,385 Career Prize Money $169,735
3 YTD Titles 0
0 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
1 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Nava VS Kachmazov H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 6-2
cross
Emilio Nava
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
60% ( 27 of 45)
1st Serve %
38% ( 13 of 34)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 7 of 13)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 6 of 21)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
29% ( 13 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 21 of 34)
53
Total Points Won
26

Nava VS Kachmazov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Nava Vs Kachmazov H2H Stats
Emilio Nava Nava Stats Alibek Kachmazov Kachmazov
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 3
2 Aces (Total) 0
4 Total Double Faults 6
0:47:58 Average Match Time 0:47:58
60% (27/45) 1st Serve % 38% (13/34)
78% (21/27) 1st Serve Win % 54% (7/13)
61% (11/18) 2nd Serve Win % 29% (6/21)
100% (5/5) Break Points Won % (Total) 25% (1/4)
62% (21/34) Return Points Win % 29% (13/45)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Emilio Nava vs Alibek Kachmazov Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Kachmazov

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 46.98% of points on their second serve, while Kachmazov has won 44.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 47.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kachmazov has won 46.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.01% and 24.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 53.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kachmazov has saved 54.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 48/ 33), with Kachmazov winning 53.13% (W/L 34/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 99/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Kachmazov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 86/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 27/ 28).
  • Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.14% of matches (W/L 47/ 23), where as Kachmazov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times and Kachmazov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Kachmazov winning 0. The last match between Nava and Kachmazov was at the Helsinki Challenger, 04-11-2024, First, I.hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:58.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Kachmazov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Kachmazov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Kachmazov 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.46 while Kachmazov has played against players with an average rank of 271.06.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kachmazov has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 38.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kachmazov has converted 28.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    SF
    W
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Murphy Cassone
    58% ( 32 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 28 of 54)
    4
    Aces
    0
    5
    Double Faults
    5
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 15 of 28)
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 10 of 26)
    75% ( 6 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    40% ( 22 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 29 of 54)
    62
    Total Points Won
    47
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Tung-Lin Wu
    59% ( 35 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 42 of 66)
    7
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    80% ( 28 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 22 of 42)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    67% ( 16 of 24)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    31% ( 18 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 28 of 66)
    69
    Total Points Won
    56
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Christian Sigsgaard
    65% ( 36 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 51 of 79)
    12
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    81% ( 29 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 33 of 51)
    63% ( 12 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 13 of 28)
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    25% ( 14 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 33 of 79)
    74
    Total Points Won
    60
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    F
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Liam Draxl
    55% ( 30 of 55)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 56 of 75)
    4
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    80% ( 24 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 33 of 56)
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 7 of 19)
    33% ( 4 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    33% ( 18 of 55)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 35 of 75)
    72
    Total Points Won
    58
    W
    6-2 7-6(2) H2H
    SF
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Eliot Spizzirri
    69% ( 44 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 46 of 74)
    4
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    0
    73% ( 32 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 32 of 46)
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    61% ( 17 of 28)
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    30% ( 19 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 25 of 74)
    70
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    7-6(6) 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Tomas Barrios Vera
    61% ( 46 of 76)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 62 of 92)
    6
    Aces
    1
    8
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 35 of 46)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 35 of 62)
    47% ( 14 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 16 of 30)
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    36% ( 27 of 76)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 41 of 92)
    90
    Total Points Won
    78
    W
    7-5 7-6(3) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Gabi Adrian Boitan
    73% ( 38 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 34 of 52)
    5
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    74% ( 28 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 19 of 34)
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 7 of 18)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    33% ( 17 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 26 of 52)
    61
    Total Points Won
    43
    W
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Chris Rodesch
    58% ( 33 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    73% ( 44 of 60)
    9
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    0
    79% ( 26 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 28 of 44)
    58% ( 14 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 7 of 16)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    30% ( 17 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 25 of 60)
    65
    Total Points Won
    52
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    F
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Nicolas Kicker
    66% ( 41 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 45 of 69)
    6
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    80% ( 33 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 29 of 45)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 8 of 24)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    31% ( 19 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 32 of 69)
    75
    Total Points Won
    56
    W
    6-1 7-6(3) H2H

    Alibek Kachmazov Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Ilia Simakin
    Player
    Alibek Kachmazov
    54% ( 54 of 100)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 64 of 110)
    14
    Aces
    5
    3
    Double Faults
    7
    85% ( 46 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 45 of 64)
    52% ( 24 of 46)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 22 of 46)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    30% ( 30 of 100)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 43 of 110)
    113
    Total Points Won
    97
    L
    6-7(7) 6-4 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Cyril Vandermeersch
    Player
    Alibek Kachmazov
    56% ( 33 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 48 of 74)
    2
    Aces
    2
    4
    Double Faults
    5
    73% ( 24 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 28 of 48)
    54% ( 14 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 9 of 26)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    36% ( 21 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 37 of 74)
    75
    Total Points Won
    58
    L
    7-5 6-3 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Borna Coric
    Player
    Alibek Kachmazov
    56% ( 47 of 84)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 60 of 91)
    5
    Aces
    10
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    85% ( 40 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 44 of 60)
    54% ( 20 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    29% ( 24 of 84)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 32 of 91)
    92
    Total Points Won
    83
    L
    4-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Alibek Kachmazov
    Player
    Liam Draxl
    62% ( 67 of 108)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 79 of 119)
    14
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    66% ( 44 of 67)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 51 of 79)
    61% ( 25 of 41)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 17 of 40)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    36% ( 39 of 108)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 51 of 119)
    120
    Total Points Won
    107
    W
    7-6(6) 5-7 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Alibek Kachmazov
    Player
    Benjamin Hassan
    61% ( 59 of 97)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 58 of 104)
    7
    Aces
    6
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 45 of 59)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 37 of 58)
    47% ( 18 of 38)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 22 of 46)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    35% ( 34 of 97)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 45 of 104)
    108
    Total Points Won
    93
    W
    6-3 4-6 7-5 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alibek Kachmazov
    Player
    Gauthier Onclin
    63% ( 36 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 32 of 54)
    8
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    69% ( 25 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    62% ( 13 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    33% ( 19 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 27 of 54)
    65
    Total Points Won
    46
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Patrick Zahraj
    Player
    Alibek Kachmazov
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 32 of 53)
    2
    Aces
    7
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    84% ( 26 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 20 of 32)
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 8 of 21)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    32% ( 17 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 25 of 53)
    61
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Lukas Klein
    Player
    Alibek Kachmazov
    60% ( 40 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 44 of 80)
    9
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    83% ( 33 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 32 of 44)
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 12 of 36)
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    30% ( 20 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 36 of 80)
    83
    Total Points Won
    64
    L
    6-1 7-6(3) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Alexander Blockx
    Player
    Alibek Kachmazov
    60% ( 40 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 31 of 50)
    7
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    70% ( 28 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 19 of 31)
    59% ( 16 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 10 of 19)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    34% ( 23 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 21 of 50)
    65
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alibek Kachmazov
    Player
    Filip Cristian Jianu
    69% ( 41 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 43 of 65)
    5
    Aces
    1
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    66% ( 27 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 29 of 43)
    94% ( 17 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    25% ( 15 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 26 of 65)
    70
    Total Points Won
    54
    W
    7-5 6-3 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Nava & Kachmazov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Emilio Nava Nava Stats Alibek Kachmazov Kachmazov
    60% (218/146) Win/Loss 60% (197/133)
    56% (483/373) Sets Win/Loss 58% (439/322)
    52% (4333/4026) Games Win/Loss 53% (3852/3477)
    0.52 Aces Per Game 0.41
    2130 Aces Total 1467
    0.25 Double Faults Per Game 0.27
    1028 Total Double Faults 951
    1:36:40 Average Match Time 1:46:17
    370.2 Average Opponent Rank 441.75
    63% (15716/25115) 1st Serve % 56% (12857/22861)
    71% (11142/15716) 1st Serve Win % 70% (8987/12857)
    51% (4837/9399) 2nd Serve Win % 51% (5114/10003)
    42% (934/2237) Break Points Won % (Total) 42% (974/2329)
    38% (9532/25174) Return Points Win % 40% (9163/22756)
    60% (213/355) Best of 3 Sets Win % 59% (192/323)
    43% (3/7) Best of 5 Sets Win % 67% (2/3)
    48% (76/157) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 58% (68/117)
    62% (74/120) Deciding Set Win % 53% (55/103)
    87% (202/175) 1st Set Won, Won Match 86% (200/171)
    13% (202/27) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 14% (200/27)
    26% (162/42) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 19% (130/25)

    Other Predictions

    Rome Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...